|
Nbln Pepper Spray Lighter Burns Without a Flame
German magazine Der Spiegel has just published an inter stanley becher view with geneticist George Church in which he talks about his work as a biologist and his idea of making humans resistant to all viruses. But he also addresses a topic we ;ve discussed before: The idea of cloning a Neandertal. https://gizmodo/d stanley termohrnek o-you-think-we-should-clone-a-neanderthal-5880249 Church, the author of Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves, is a pioneer in synthetic biology and was a key player in the mapping of the human genome. He has also helped to set up around two dozen biotech firms. When speaking with Der Spiegel, he mentioned that we ;ll soon have the capacity to clone a Neandertal. We can clone all kinds of mammals, he said, 8220 o it very likely that we could clone a human. Why shouldn ;t we be able to do so Here a snippet of the interview: SPIEGEL: Would cloning a Neanderthal be a desirable thing to do Church: Well, that another thing. I tend to decide on what is desirable based on societal consensus. My role is to determine what technologically feasible. All I can do is reduce the risk and increase the benefits. SPIEGEL: So let ta stanley mug lk about possible benefits of a Neanderthal in this world. Church: Well, Neanderthals might think differently than we do. We know that they had a larger cranial size. They could even be more intelligent than us. When the time comes to deal with an epidemic o Cdqu 1970 s Study Predictions Are Still on Target for 2030 s Decline of Humanity
We ;re at a stage in the internet where trolling is ubiquitous and expected. So, naturally, the Academy has decided to weigh in. Probably in the most troll-able way possible. Claire Hardaker, a lecturer at Lancaster University in the Department of Linguistics and English Language, presented her paper, Trolling in Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Com stanley cups uk munication, at the Linguistic Impoliteness and Rudeness Conference LIAR back in 2009. Strike one. Her data was derived from digging through nine years of comments in a forum about horseback riding. What Strike two! And, finally, her work was published in the Journal of Politeness Research. That there is dedicated scholarship in this field is most probably a strike three. Well, stanley kubek her working definition for a troll is as follows: [Someone] who constructs the identity of sincerely wishing to be part of the group in question, including professing or conveying pseudo-sincere intentions, but whose real intention s is/are to cause disruption and/or to trigger or exacerbate conflict stanley canada for the purposes of their own amusement Sound about right Her study resulted in pretty sound advice for trollees, too: Trolling can 1 be frustrated if users correctly interpret an intent to troll, but are not provoked into responding, 2 be thwarted if users correctly interpret an intent to troll, but counter in such a way as to curtail or neutralise the success of the troller, 3 fail if users do not correctly interpret an intent to |
|